|
Table
of Contents
Telescopes
Terminology
Purpose
Atmospheric
Nomenclature
Questions
Intro
to Astronomy
Misconceptions
Archaeoastronomy
Equitorial Coordinates
Understanding the Seasons
Time & Its Measurement
Solar
& Lunar Eclipses
The
Solar System
The
Earth
The
Moon
Mecury,
Venus, Mars
The
Outer Planets
Solar
System Debris
The
Sun
Evolution
of Stars
Intersteller
Matter
Sky
Literacy
|
|
The Purpose of Building Telescopes
- To Gather Light: Simplistically, a telescope
could be defined as a light bucket. The amount of light gathered by
a lens or mirror in comparison to the eye can be expressed as 16D²,
where D is the aperture of the lens or mirror expressed in inches.
This equation does not take into consideration light losses due to
transmission or reflection, which may be considerable. A more realistic
approach might be 9D². The following table lists the light gathering
capabilities of various apertures.
| |
Aperture (in)
|
|
9D²
|
16D²
|
|
(6.4 mm)
|
¼
|
human eye |
|
1
|
| |
2
|
small refractor |
36
|
64
|
| |
4
|
|
144
|
256
|
| |
8
|
|
576
|
1024
|
| |
12
|
|
1300
|
2300
|
|
(3 m)
|
96
|
Hubble, USA
|
83,000
|
147,000
|
|
(5 m)
|
200
|
Hale, USA
|
360,000
|
640,000
|
|
(10 m)
|
400
|
Keck, USA
|
1,440,000
|
2,560,000
|
Note that as the aperture doubles, the light
grasp quadruples.
- Magnification: The ability to make an image appear larger
than its apparent unaided dimension.
- Magnification: focal length of telescope / focal length of eyepiece.
- The longer the focal length of the system, the higher the potential
is for magnification. A 6 inch, F/12 (fl = 72 inches) telescope
will produce a higher magnification than a 10 inch, F/5 system
(fl = 50 inches) using the same eyepiece.
- Limits of Useful Magnification: 6X to 60X per inch.
- Upper Limits: An image of an extended
object, such as the sun, moon, or a planat, can be said to
be composed of a structure of tightly packed dots -- diffraction
disks -- similar to a newspaper or magazine photograph. If
a newspaper picture is positioned across the room from an
observer, a certain amount of detail is perceived in the image.
As the observer approaches the picture, it appears larger
or magnified over its original dimensions, and more detail
can be seen. A position will be reached, however, where there
will be no more increase in the amount of information seen
in the image. At this point, any further magnification is
empty. If the observer continues to decrease his/her
distance to the photo, even though the magnification increases,
the detail in the image will suffer.
- Lower Limits: The diameter of the emerging light
cone coming from the eyepiece (called the exit pupil) becomes
larger as the magnification of the system decreases. If the
exit pupil diameter exceeds the aperture of the eye's pupillary
diameter, then the observer is not utilizing the full capabilities
of the optics which he/she is employing. The lowest magnification
used on a telescope should be governed by the largest exit
pupil size which the eye can fully accept. For middle-aged
individuals, who do not smoke, 5 mm is generally considered
the acceptable value. Mathematically, the exit pupil is defined
as the aperture divided by the magnification.
- Magnification and Aperture: A telescope with a larger
aperture will produce an image composed of smaller diffraction
disks (dots) and therefore will allow a higher magnification to
be applied to that image before deterioration sets in.
- Doubling the Magnification will cause the field of view
and image brightness to decrease to one quarter its orginial value.
One can literally magnify an image beyond its level of detection
by the human eye.
- Resolution: The ability of an optical system to separate
objects of close angular measure so that they may be seen by the observer.
- Angles: A circle contains 360 degrees, each of which
can be broken into 60 parts called minutes. Each minute of arc
can be further divided into 60 seconds. Therefore, a circle contains
over one million seconds of arc (1,296,000 seconds exactly).
- Mathematically, resolution may be expressed by two basic
formulae:
- Rayleigh Criterion: 5.45 seconds of arc
/ aperture in inches. The Rayleigh criterion is based upon
theoretical concerns dealing with the physics of light.
- Dawes' Limit: 4.56 seconds or arc / aperture
in inches. Dawes' Limit is based upon the subjective observations
of W. R. Dawes, a 19th century British astronomer.
- Resolution potentials of various apertures:
| |
Aperture (in)
|
|
Rayleigh
|
Dawes'
|
|
(6.4 mm)
|
¼
|
human eye |
21.8
|
18.24
|
| |
2
|
small refractor |
2.73
|
2.28
|
| |
4
|
|
1.36
|
1.14
|
| |
8
|
|
0.68
|
0.57
|
|
(3 m)
|
96
|
Hubble, USA
|
0.057
|
0.048
|
|
(5 m)
|
200
|
Hale, USA
|
0.0273
|
0.023
|
|
(10 m)
|
400
|
Keck, USA
|
0.014
|
0.011
|
The best resolution of the human eye is about
two minutes of arc. Normally, it is about five minutes.
- One second of arc resolution on the moon equals about a one
mile separation on the lunar surface. A resolution of one half
second represents the practical limit of resolution for large
aperture telescopes due to atmospheric turbulence (called seeing).
It also exemplifies the importance of operating large instrumentation
above the earth's atmosphere, where full resolution capabilities
can be obtained.
- The relationship of magnification of extended objects to
resolution: It is important to realize that the number representing
the resolution in seconds of arc also specifies the angular size
of the diffraction disks which compose the image. Applying this
reasoning to magnification, it can be seen that the smaller the
aperture, the coarser the dot structure of the image will become.
Higher magnifications will be less successful with smaller aperture
scopes.
- Resolution as it applies to diffraction disks: The resolution
of a system also dictates the minimum angular separation, or the
angular proximity to which detail can be separated into its individual
components. As an example, the following series of dots illustrates
an exaggerated, but scaled appearance of the same double star
system as viewed through three telescopes of different apertures.
The two stars have an angular separation of 1.2 seconds of arc.
Note that as the aperture increases, the diffraction disks become
smaller, eventually revealing the double as two distinct objects.
At this point the system is said to be fully resolved.
- 1-inch aperture (4.56 sec. of arc res.) Double appears as
one object through the eyepiece.
- 2-inch aperture (2.28 sec. of arc res.) Image of double
appears to be elongated.
- 4-inch aperture (1.14 sec. of arc res.) Image is fully resolved.
- Contrast: A telescope with good contrast characteristics
will allow the observer to differentiate between the various subtle
shadings of gray within an astronomical image. The diffraction disks
are the key to understanding contrast. The diffraction disks are,
in actuality, composed of a disk surrounded by a series of concentric
rings of decreasing intensity.
The contrast of an image is dependent upon
the amount of light which is contained in the central disk versus
the surrounding rings. The light which falls into the rings is wasted
and does not go into the formation of the image, but merely serves
to "haze" the picture. Contrast is reduced. Again, the analogy of
the newspaper photograph is appropriate. The small dots of various
shades of gray form the image. The contrast of the photo would be
enhanced if the picture were printed on whiter paper and reduced if
printed on grayer paper. In the latter case, the detail in the picture
would still be there, but it would present more of a challenge to
discern, because of the lack of contrast. The contrast of an image
can be improved if the greatest amount of light possible is concentrated
into the center disk. A reduction in contrast simply means that the
telescope is putting more light into the rings surrounding the diffraction
disks which compose the image.
- Perfect contrast: Under ideal conditions no more than
84% of the light will fall into the diffraction disk. Sixteen
percent of the light will therefore be found in the rings.
- Conditions which may reduce the contrast performance of a
telescope:
- The optical perfection of the system: The lower
the quality, the lower the contrast.
- The size of an obstruction in the optical path of a telescope
reduces contrast. These normally include the secondary mirror,
as well as any support structures holding that mirror. As
light passes the opaque surface of an obstruction, it is bent
slightly causing more light to fall into the rings surrounding
the diffraction disk. This phenomenon is called diffraction.
- Definition: The sharpness of the image. Definition is a function
of the optical accuracy of the system. The more precise the optical
accuracy, the finer the definition will become.
- Astronomically acceptable telescope: The maximum tolerance
for an astronomically acceptable image is 1375 Angstroms of deviation
of the optical wave front at the image plane. This is compared
to a wavelength of sodium light which has a separation of 5500
Å, which equals one wave. Therefore the minimum rating for a telescope
which would produce acceptable images is ¼ wave. One Angstrom
equals 0.00000001 cm (10-8 cm) or 0.000000004 inch (4 x 10-9 inch).
To be astronomically acceptable, a telescopic system must produce
an image with an deviation of no more than 0.000000004 inch /
Å x 1375 Å = 0.0000055 inch or 5 / 1,000,000th of an inch (5.5
x 10-6 inch).
- Comparing resolution and definition: Very often the terms
resolution and definition are considered to be the same. This
is not true. A 2-inch refractor of superb optical quality will
produce images of exceptional clarity and contrast, but it will
only resolve objects with a minimum separation of 2.28 seconds
of arc. The instrument will still be rather poor with respect
to resolution because this is a factor of aperture. A large, optically
flawed instrument will give poor definition, but may be fairly
adequate with respect to resolution. It will probably not reach
the theoretical performance as suggested by Rayleigh or Dawes.
- Field of View: The area of the sky visible through the telescope
eyepiece. Generally speaking, the higher the magnification, the smaller
the field of view. Since magnification is directly related to focal
length, one could also say that the longer the focal length of the
telescope, the narrower will be the field of view as witnessed through
similar eyepieces.
- Mathematically, field of view = apparent field of eyepiece
/ magnification
- The apparent field of the eyepiece represents the measure
of the angle of the light cone which the field lens of the eyepiece
is producing within the eyepiece barrel. The field lens is the
lens of the eyepiece which first intercepts the light cone being
formed by the optical system of the telescope. The eye lens of
an eyepiece is closest to the eye when looking into an eyepiece.
|